The graph below indicates how ussually people in the United States ate in fast food restaurant from 2003 to 2013.
It can be seen that in 2006, the number of people who eat fast food once a week was higher than others. Meanwhile, eating fast food once or twice a month was a trend in 2013, so we can know that people in the United States in 2006 ate more fast food than in 2013. The tendency of eating fast food everday tends to reduce by 2006 and 2013. The ratio of people who never consumed any fast food in 2003 was the biggest with 5 percent. Furthermore, the biggest percentage in 2003 was for the group of people who ate junk food once a week, it was more than 30 percent and in 2013 the people who ate once or twice a week was more than others with about 33 percent.
In conclusion, people eat fast reduces from 2003 to 2013.It can be vividly manifested that there were fewer people who ate packaged food daily and who never ate junk food at eating house.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views a 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the cases What can be done this problem 89
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In modern society some people argue that schools become unnecessary as children can study at home via the Internet Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ople eat fast reduces from 2003 to 2013.It can be vividly manifested that there we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, as for, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.23783783784 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.02283530558 2.65546596893 76% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459459459459 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5854749371 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247590495054 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159076759458 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724528913264 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224840202578 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652628029811 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.61 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.