The given bar charts compares the proportion of people in USA who eat at fast food restaurants in terms of frequency in three separate years. On the whole, the percentage of people saw a fluctuating trend regardless of the given years.
Turning to the detail, in terms of the pinnacle, over 30% of people ate fast food at restaurants once a week in the year 2006. However, the percentage of people who choose to eat at fast food restaurant every day accounted for merely 5% in 2006. It is worth noting that the frequency of once or twice a month observed the maximum figure, culminating at 33% in 2013. In contrast, the least number in 2013 fell into the group "every day", with only 3%.
The most striking point is the similarity in the chart. Equivalence could be observed in the frequency of a few times a year, comprising 15% of people in 2006 and 2013. Likewise, the proportion of people who never patronize fast food restaurant in 2006 is on par with that of 2013, at around 4%
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 34
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 84
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number young adults, compared with the number older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, in contrast, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58659217877 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6619979834 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541899441341 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9340658095 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20016579748 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879125133594 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554300732469 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146534812869 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00510731911166 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.