The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.

The bar chart illustrates how often Americans had fast food in restaurants from 2003 to 2013. It is clear that the majority of people ate fast food once a week or once or twice a month.
Starting with America people who had fast food everyday, several times a week, once a week and never, the number showed a downward trend. Though the percentage of fast food lovers who ate them several times a week rose from 31% to 33% in 2006, it fell down to 28% in 2013. The same trend can be seen in that of people who did it several times a week but it changed more slighlty.Unlikely, the number of people who never had fastfood or had it on a daily basis first decreased slighlt in 2006 and then remained stable in 2013 (less than 5%).
Turning now to the frequency of eating fast food once or twice a month and a few times a year, the decade witnessed a rise of the proportion of it. The number of who bought fast food in restaurant once or twice a month fluctuated, falling to the bottom out at 25% in 2006, surpassing that of other frequency and rising to biggest percentage of 33% in 2013. However, the percentage of Americans seldom ate fastfood rose from 13%to 15% in 2006 and kept unchanged in 2013.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 Beniox 56 view
2020-01-09 Noah1997 56 view
2020-01-09 Noah1997 56 view
2019-12-23 Sushmabenarji 56 view
2019-12-10 Lucre96 73 view
Essays by user Frank Chen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 48, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...g with America people who had fast food everyday, several times a week, once a week and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Unlikely
...mes a week but it changed more slighlty.Unlikely, the number of people who never had fas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the biggest'.
Suggestion: to the biggest
...sing that of other frequency and rising to biggest percentage of 33% in 2013. However, the...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31415929204 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46237645998 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491150442478 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.097989046 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275302801627 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142707792927 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871956987961 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224752848311 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109084751995 0.0819641961636 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.