The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.

The given bar chart illustrates the habit of Americans in fast food establishments over the 10-year period from 2003 to 2013.
In general, Americans paid the most attention at fast food restaurants between once a week and once or twice a month through in all three years. Strikingly, the opposite was true of everyday.
Looking at the details, close to 60% of people in the US chose to eat fast food in restaurants between weekly and once or twice a month a month. There was about 15 to 20% of Americans reported eating in fast food restaurants several times a week, while 3 to 4% of people ate in these daily. At the other end of the scale, around 4 to 5% of people avoided fast food establishments completely.
Between 2006 and 2013, the rate of eating fast food in restaurants in the USA either several times or once a week felt by almost 10%. By contrast, the “one or twice a month” category underwent an increase of around 8% from 25% to 33%. We can see that the common habit in 2003 and 2006 became a monthly or twice monthly in 2013.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 Beniox 56 view
2020-01-09 Noah1997 56 view
2020-01-09 Noah1997 56 view
2019-12-23 Sushmabenarji 56 view
2019-12-10 Lucre96 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s. Strikingly, the opposite was true of everyday. Looking at the details, close to 60% ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'a month'.
Suggestion: a month
...urants between weekly and once or twice a month a month. There was about 15 to 20% of Americans...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47150259067 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63427556822 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8116540402 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8888888889 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309465545695 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129405424274 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821255363138 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18829360999 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504013801601 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.