The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Given is the the graph revealing about how often people consumed fast food restaurants in the USA from 2003 to 2013. Overall, it can be obviously seen that, this period during which had the highest percentages of people eating junk food once a week and twice a month had the lowest percentages of community consuming fast feed both everyday and never.
So clearly did the figure have that, there are two figures having same-highest percentage in once a week in 2006 and twice a month in 2013 at approximately 33%. Moreover, in 2003, consumer fast food once a week and also twice a month had similar percentage about 30 %. Afterwards, those trend had a peak and a plunge respectively. In addition, Frequency of society eating fast food in restaurants in every day and never had less percentages, which accounted for 5% during period.
Moving to another analysis, firstly, in several times a week trend of consuming fast food experienced downward from around 10% in first time to 15 % in recent year. Meanwhile, in a few times a year, the people loving junk food restaurant tended to count stable around 15%.
- The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 90
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- At present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of young people.do the advantges of this situation outweigh the advantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
Given is the the graph revealing about how often people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
Given is the the graph revealing about how often people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s of community consuming fast feed both everyday and never. So clearly did the figur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...y consuming fast feed both everyday and never. So clearly did the figure have tha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in everyday'?
Suggestion: in everyday
...society eating fast food in restaurants in every day and never had less percentages, which a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun percentages is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... restaurants in every day and never had less percentages, which accounted for 5% dur...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., which accounted for 5% during period. Moving to another analysis, firstly, in ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84736842105 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69789152981 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.48308339 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221058562124 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111222301515 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110728146706 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158185163244 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646018307375 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.