The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The bar chart provides information about the proportion of frequency of eating at fast food restaurants among people in the years 2003-2013.
Overall, it is clear that the majority of Americans ate unhealthy meals in restaurants between once a week or once, twice a month in all three years, while junk food was eaten every day or never by the tiny minority of folks.
It can be seen from the graph that the biggest proportion of frequency of people, more than a quarter, opted to eat unhealthy food once a week or once, twice a month throughout the given period. In contrast, roughly 5% of folks reported eating junk food in restaurants every day in 2003, whereas this rate slightly decreased over the period. Similarly, around the same percentage of Americans had never eaten at such restaurants, as is illustrated by the graph. At the same time, the number of inhabitants, who ate junk food a few times a year, increased modestly to 15% in the year 2006 and remained stable over the next 7 years. In addition, the percentage of frequency of eating fast food among people who were eaten fast food at least several times a week made up nearly a fifth in the years 2003-2013.</span><br>
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by tax 78
- IELTS 10 Test 3 Writing Task 1 - Academic 11
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation’s history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices.How important is it to maintain old buil 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, whereas, while, at least, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87142857143 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18958409703 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.8202861748 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.142857143 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232991548148 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105130028351 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793074825639 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167616918885 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451865552744 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.