The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares how often American attended fast food restaurant in three different years.
In 2003, the percentages of people who went to fast food restaurant every day and never went to fast food restaurant were 4% and 5% respectively. The figures for both groups declined by 1% in 2006 and then did not change.
The majority of American tended to have fast food once a week or once or twice a month. The percentage of former group increased from 31% in 2003 to 33% in 2006, before experienced a fall to 7% in 2013. The other group saw an opposite trend, the figure decreased from 30% in 2003 to 25% in 2006, and then rose significantly to 33% in 2013.
There was 17% of American residents chose to eat fast food several times a week, the percentage fluctuated to 16% ten years later. 13% of American had fast food a few times a year, this figure rose to 15% in 2006 and then remained stable.
Overall, more than half of American ate fast food once a week or once or twice a month.
- Nowadays it is more convenient and easier for people to travel to other countries Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 72
- Nowadays some countries encourage people to buy more and more products while others believe it has negative effects on the society Discuss both views and give your opinion 88
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d once a week or once or twice a month. The percentage of former group increased fr...
^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...efore experienced a fall to 7% in 2013. The other group saw an opposite trend, the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43783783784 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44235812717 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9481433661 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186838875677 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822827955229 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603692145773 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116192739136 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429392068445 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.