The chart depicts how often American residents go to eat in junk food restaurants from 2003 to 2013.
Among the majority of frequencies, there is a similar trend between the rate of several times a week and going there weekly, both increasing slightly first before falling back to around 16% and 28% respectively in 2013. By contrast, the proportion of people eating fast food once or twice a month had decreased to just 25% by 2006 before growing dramatically to approximately 33% by the end of this period.
On the other hand, as for the minority of frequencies, the percentage of people who opted to eat there every day almost halved, declining from 4% in 2003 to 2% in 2006 before leveling off. Besides, the frequency of never going saw a similar trend, falling between just 5% and around 4%, and then was unchanged till 2013. In contrast, the proportion of those only getting there a few times a year had risen to just 15% by 2006 before keeping constant.
Overall, more than three-quarters of people in the USA went where they ate fast food at least once or twice a month or even several times a week regardless of what period it is.
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful Architects should not worry about producing building as a work of art 93
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- International travel makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, then, as for, at least, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65196078431 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61584262548 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598039215686 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.9463262264 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.571428571 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171425124424 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790872975485 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622298782051 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118822131603 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549912004844 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.