The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The chart provides information on the numbers of fast food lovers in the US and how often they went to restaurants over a 10-year period. In general, it is plainly visible that more than a third of Americans attended the fast food places between 2003 and 2013, but the frequency of their preference gradually decreased.
Regarding to the percentage of people, it reached the highest point in 2006 and 2013, standing at 32% respectively. However, the rate diminished more than twice in this time-period showing a dramatic downward from once a week to once or twice per week considerably.
With respect to the smallest ratio, only a significant minority of fast food eaters, around 3 percent, have preferred restaurants every day from 2003 to 2013. Basically, almost a fifth ate snack in such places several times a week, and well over a tenth, almost 15%, attended a few times a year in the contrary of a tiny fraction of those who had never been there during the estimated time-period.
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbing. What factors contribute to job satisfation? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart compares the amount of time spent by people in the UK on three different types of phone call between 1995 and 2002. 11
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...there during the estimated time-period.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, third, well, in general, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87573964497 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77208672838 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662721893491 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.0512483795 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.333333333 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240794535694 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110577332232 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703672871165 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150020415175 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835220515679 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.