The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the frequency of eating at fast food restaurants among people in the USA between the years 2003 and 2013. It is measured in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that there is a low rate in the habit of eating and never eating junk food at all.
At the beginning, in the years 2003, 2006 and 2013 people that eat fast food frequently and also the ones that certainly don’t is low compared to the population that consumes it between several times a week and a few times a year (approximately 3% to 4%).
However, the people in the USA who consumes once a week had the highest rate of somehow 33% even in the years 2006 and once or twice a month in the year 2013.
At the end, we can say that over the years (in 2013), American people are eating less at fast food restaurants than the previous years (2003 and 2006).
- the two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the ma 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 688.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32704402516 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36581671369 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1112243972 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204415969414 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114074340863 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10028757741 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136362324488 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441953847021 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.13 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.