The chart illustrates the total expenditure that the government of the UAE spent on a host of fields and sectors in 2000.
In general, it is evident that the budget is more than 300 billion AED. The largest sum of money was spent on social security, which makes up one-third of the budget, and transport received the least financial support with merely 10 billion AED.
According to the given chart, social security and health and personal social services were the two sectors that required the most extravagant amount of money with 100 billion and 53 billion AED respectively. In contrast, the sector of law and order (17 billion), housing, heritage, and environment (15 billion) as well as industry, agriculture, and employment (13 billion) had a lesser amount of budget money allocated and saw a 2-billion differences for each sector.
Education is the third-highest section that the national leadership decided to spent money on with almost 40 billion AED. As can be seen, debt interest and other expenditures both receive a 23-billion budget. When comparing with defence, the aforementioned sectors were contributed one billion more.
- Many parents today organize extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school 78
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In contemporary society everyone should have equal opportunities in education Therefore universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company while others think that employees should be involved in the decision making process too Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, third, well, in contrast, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87312205353 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8100269281 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233251531112 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108886902711 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905330707072 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16879100353 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987332044424 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.