The pie charts depict how students utilized a range of transport to commute to a university from 2004 to 2009.
Overall, commuting on buses and cars were the two most prevalent ways of going to the education property, whereas trains were least favored by students in both aforementioned years.
To begin with, the share of car commuters crossed the halfway mark in 2004 with 51%. However, this mode of transportation decreased its popularity in 2009 as the proportion halved that of 2004. Buses, on the contrary, witnessed a significant rise from merely 35% to close vicinity of 50%; therefore, it was the lion’s share of the chart in 2009.
In addition, the number of cyclists also went up during the time period as the share of bicycles doubled, with 9% and 16% in 2004 and 2009, respectively. However, the students’ use of train nearly stayed the same during the period, and this trend is also similar for those who walk to school.
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 89
- What are the pros and cons of using public transport 84
- It is often argued that it is difficult to get children to read Why do you think this is What measures could be taken to encourage children to read more Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82716049383 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69659135545 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9548716947 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2857142857 5.23603664747 235% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212225640843 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993799773724 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088198323622 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1313308733 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956274722141 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.