The chart below shows information about average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The given bar chart depicts data on the changes in average house prices in five different cities, over a 12-year period, namely between 1990 and 2002. The figures are compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Looking at the figures recorded between 1990 and 1995, it can be observed that there were slight increases in the average house prices in Madrid and Frankfurt, by approximately 1% and 2% respectively. Conversely, the average house prices in the other three cities significantly decreased. In Tokyo and London the prices went down by about 7%, whereas in New York by 2 percentage points less.
Between 1996 and 2002, in every city except Frankfurt, the average house prices showed an upward trend. One thing that stands out in the chart is that the prices in London rose by nearly 12%. This comes in sharp contrast with the average house prices in New York, where the figure increased by 5%, in Madrid it went up by about 3% and in Frankfurt it rose by a mere 1%. The prices in Tokyo declined by 5%, not as dramatic as between 1990 and 1995.
To sum up, it is clear that the average house prices were generally higher between 1996 and 2002 and lower between 1990 and 1995, than in 1989.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-29 | albertonian | 73 | view |
| 2016-07-28 | Daniel2016 | 78 | view |
| 2014-11-27 | indermann91@ymail.com | 80 | view |
| 2014-05-16 | kya | 80 | view |
| 2014-05-12 | kaj | 60 | view |
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 95
- The chart below shows information about average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 78
- Some people think it is importat to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 84
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton 92
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'if', 'look', 'whereas', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231707317073 0.268076937826 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.0934959349593 0.116061578633 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0772357723577 0.0759168565197 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0447154471545 0.0366838410393 122% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0162601626016 0.0131127313244 124% => OK
Prepositions: 0.174796747967 0.155750635184 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0284552845528 0.0379272487307 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.31926584307 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00406504065041 0.0210936926555 19% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0121951219512 0.00175180941692 696% => OK
Determiners: 0.0853658536585 0.0948980150116 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00406504065041 0.00437022459523 93% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00813008130081 0.00967000014798 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1209.0 1161.00487805 104% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.9 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62325581395 5.90752243213 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73763899035 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.311627906977 0.337110787985 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.190697674419 0.247514529752 77% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0883720930233 0.171178102325 52% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0604651162791 0.112407865282 54% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31926584307 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525581395349 0.546246751206 96% => OK
Word variations: 47.4753431873 49.3433353143 96% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5 23.0094962315 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5372254513 42.9750493124 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.9 135.714022679 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.0094962315 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.689975730869 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 40.5697674419 47.7609492067 85% => OK
Elegance: 2.81578947368 2.94281807926 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.625342690763 0.418131533498 150% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.138310889752 0.181151798455 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0574934666172 0.0850326197045 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.710376329896 0.706616315825 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14489799444 0.157042692854 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.354713877608 0.228904883108 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726976477191 0.108899403657 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.521939204833 0.367819155151 142% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.114799446554 0.0812612215331 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.488282951944 0.316326947829 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630298939852 0.0921553760075 68% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.08536585366 171% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.02926829268 231% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.