The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house price in 1989.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the changes of average expenditures on building a house in five major cities over the 13-years period compared with the average cost in 1989. Overall, besides Frankfurt, the housing price in other four cities experienced an upward trend throughout the surveyed period.
To be more specific, during 1990 to 1995, London and Toyko had relatively low house cost as they both dropped 7% from the original prices. New York also decreased its house price by 5%, whereas the price in Madrid and Frankfurt were slightly higher than that in 1989, which rose 1% and 2% respectively.
As for the period of 1996-2000, more cities had a higher price figure when compared with the average house price in 1989. The biggest change happened in London, where the price went up by 11%. Similar change also can be viewed in New York and Madrid, with the increase of 5% and 4% respectively. The house price in Tokyo was 5% lower than its counterpart in 1989, while the cost to buy a house in Frankfurt almost kept stable during the measured period.
- Over the past century, reading, writing, and maths skills are always the most important parts of education. Some people argue that every child will benefit if a fourth skill is added: the computer skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 66
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 74
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
'compared with the average house price in 1989' is duplicated.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 01 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 183 200
No. of Characters: 843 1000
No. of Different Words: 105 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.678 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.607 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.44 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 35 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.51 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.464 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.635 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78142076503 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46775617476 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0845620847 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340297051747 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153550422384 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097477311335 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244053766462 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070310984061 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.