The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The given bar chart compares the price of an average house in five categories over a period of 13 years from 1989.
Generally, it is evident that house prices plummeted remarkably between 1990 and 1995, but then most of the cities saw rising prices during the second half of the period. London experienced by far the greatest changes in house prices over the period.
From 1990 to 1995, the house prices of New York went down by 5% while the cost of average houses in London and Tokyo hit a low of 7 percent. In contrast, the proportion of house prices in both Madrid and Frankfurt rose by approximately 2%.
Between 1996 and 2002, houses became more expensive in London, with its figure showing a rocket of approximately 12%. A similar pattern was seen in the proportion of New York and Madrid, which jumped to around 5% and 4% respectively, compared to an increase of only 1% in Frankfurt. However, the portion of homebuyers in Tokyo seeking homes might pay cheaper than they were in 1989
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
- some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65909090909 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54474421907 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5777697028 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43329774008 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173209186199 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985254017318 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255183481871 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727363802039 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.