The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart shows a glimpse of the real estate market in five various cities throughout the world over two periods, from 1990 to 1995 and from 1996 to 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Generally, there were significant differences in the housing market in those five cities in the last century. While some experienced a long period of growth, the rest were obedient to price fluctuations.
It is can be seen from the diagram that Madrid is the only city which had housing prices climb throughout the ten-year period. In the first five years, around a 1,5% rise was recorded in Madrid. The increase quickened in subsequent years, with a 4% again seen. To great surprise, London and New York cities underwent a similar trend, to be exact, compared with 1989, the latter had a fall of 7% between 1990 and 1995 but then it had an astounding approximately 12% increase in following years as against the former.
By contrast, the property market of Tokyo was continuously at the collapse, reflected in an average 6,5% drop. It is notable that the decrease in the housing price in Frankfurt was narrower, about 1,5% of growth over the period from 1996 to 2002, but still disappointing, compared to its around 2,5% increase in the first half of the 1950s.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-18 | trangh16688 | 84 | view |
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestations 69
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for this country. What are the reason? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 84
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some peole, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give our own opinion. 73
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in weathy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not. 73
- In some countries, the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the cause of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76018099548 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58716713712 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579185520362 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9672851768 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274730513526 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101892253265 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738125210226 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169804276744 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639590153388 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.