The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The bar chart compares five major cities in terms of the changes in the cost of an average house over a period of 13 years.
The average house prices in London between 1990 and 1995 were significantly lower than that in 1989 (7%), which was the largest decrease in these five cities. However, a dramatic increase was seen from 1996 to 2002, with an around 11% increase from the average prices in 1989. The figure for New York showed a similar pattern, declining 5% during the first period and then rising 5% during the second one.
Tokyo was the only country that experienced a continued decrease in house prices, dropping 7% and 5% in the two periods respectively.
The costs of an average house in both Madrid and Frankfurt climbed before the year 1996, 1% and 2% respectively. While the prices in Madrid increased even more over the six years after 1995, the growth in that of Frankfurt slowed to approximately 1%.
Overall, the property prices in London and New York were volatile during this 13-year period, in contrast to the consistently rising prices in Madrid and Frankfurt. Tokyo’s houses were increasingly affordable.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 78
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine.A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 52
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a sign 86
- The table shows the amount of waste produced by different countries in 1980, 1990, 2000. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, then, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98445595855 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60463595018 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1055550594 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338729545695 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132740050466 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933523091351 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173998768859 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094365086649 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.