The table shows a subway system in London, Paris, and Moscow. The data compare a total length, number of stations, and number of daily passengers.
Overall, London has a more total track length than a Paris and Moscow at 408 Km, and lower a Total track length is Paris at 214 Km but for a number of daily passengers Paris more than a London at 4.5 million.
Other, Moscow has number passengers more than all at 6.5 million, and total track length at 300 km and a number of station in operation at 182, compare as London on a number of daily at 3 million more less than Moscow and Paris, but for the number of station London has 275 operations that are a middle between the other.
In conclusion, a subway system for Total track length is London, and a number of station in operation is Paris, and Number of daily passengers is Moscow.
- The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000 and 2010. 56
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Task2:Today more people are travelling than ever before.Why is this the case?What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 56
- The chart below shows information about subway systems in three major European cities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main information and making comparisons. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a number of station in operation at 182, compare as London on a number of daily a...
^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns that are a middle between the other. In conclusion, a subway system for Tota...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e between the other. In conclusion, a subway system for Total track length i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 691.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45806451613 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33630354534 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 62.0 106.607317073 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.8006396567 43.030603864 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.2 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0259177559785 0.215688989381 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366803341101 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520635718886 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0317866318743 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033184825934 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.18 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.