The chart below shows Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows Japan’s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Given is the line graph depicting the population changes in 3 group of ages from 1960 to the present and giving a prediction to 2040.
Perceptibly, the figure of those in the age of 0 to 14 is supposed to leap continuously, while the opposite is true with the group of 25 to 64 and over 65. However, among three groups of ages, the middle age group contains the biggest volume through the years.
Leaping to the highest point of 70% in 1970 from 65% in the first year, the population of the 25 to 64-year-old oscillated between 70% to 68% to 2000 before witnessing an extreme slump to just 60% in 2020 . After this rate is predicted to plunge continually to 55% a decade later, it seemingly reaches a recovery to 58% in the last year. From the second rank with 30% in 1960, the population of kids from 0 to 14 was recorded to surge to 35% in the next 10 years; this number, however, plunged sharply through the period of 50 years. The rest of the course registers a vague moderation to just 10% which is the lowest figure in 2040.
Turning to that of the oldest group, 5% was recorded to be the smallest number in 1960. After a ten-year plateau, this number experienced a sharp proliferation to 30% in 2020. There is a projection that it continues to soar up to 35% and reach the second rank in 2040.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-05-22 kevann 73 view
Essays by user kevann :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ing an extreme slump to just 60% in 2020 . After this rate is predicted to plunge ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34016393443 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54209376952 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549180327869 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7128277632 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121737724778 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527367410024 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481033850697 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932228790583 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477177005011 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ing an extreme slump to just 60% in 2020 . After this rate is predicted to plunge ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34016393443 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54209376952 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549180327869 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7128277632 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121737724778 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527367410024 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481033850697 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932228790583 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477177005011 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.