The chart below shows male and female fitness membership in Thailand between 1985 and 2015

Essay topics:

The chart below shows male and female fitness membership in Thailand between 1985 and 2015

The bar chart compares the number of fitness membership in Thailand of women and men from 1985 to 2015.
Overall, it is clear that the number of women membership rose significantly, the opposite was true for men fitness membership. Also, in 2010 the figure for both women and men was higher during.
In 1985, the males accounted for over 2000 member in Thailand as opposed to around 1300 female member. over the following five years, both groups increased, the percentage of men stood at about 3800 members, 2 times as much as that of 1800 women member. Ten years later, while the number of women rose to 2800 members, male’s figure falling to 1800 members. Between 2005 and 2015, the proportion of two groups remained above 2000 membership. After that, the number of males rose to the peak point to 5000 members, was around 1.5 times as much as that of females until 2010 before falling to 2000 members and 1000 members in women and men respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-05 Thao Ha 67 view
Essays by user Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and of women and men from 1985 to 2015. Overall, it is clear that the number of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'member' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'members'.
Suggestion: members
...ailand as opposed to around 1300 female member. over the following five years, both gr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...s opposed to around 1300 female member. over the following five years, both groups i...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81437125749 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42957384584 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532934131737 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6501425568 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232615770693 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117934896203 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112646248626 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198291930187 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115143331129 0.0819641961636 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.