The bar chart illustrates the number of people in both genders, who hit a gym from 1985 to 2015.
Overall, there are a downward trend in females, who go to a fitness center over three decades and an opposite trend was witnessed in males. In addition, 2010 registered the highest figures for fitness members in males and females.
The quantity of men, who were members of fitness center, stood over two thousand people, which doubled that of women in 1985. Ten years later, the figures for males increased significantly before falling sharply just under two thousand people. Meanwhile a steady rise experienced in the number of women, who hit a gym and then reading a peak of roughly three thousand people in 2000, when the first time that of women was higher than that of men.
Over five years, a drop by about one thousand males who were members of a fitness center, two thousand people, was also the figures for females in that time. Besides, an upward trend was seen in males and females fitness membership, reaching the highest at five thousand and three thousand people, respectively in the following five years. By contrast in the end year of period, the number of people in both genders decreased and the second time that of females was two times as high as that of males approximately two thousand people.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'trends'?
Suggestion: trends
...to 2015. Overall, there are a downward trend in females, who go to a fitness center ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a fitness center over three decades and an opposite trend was witnessed in males...
^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...sharply just under two thousand people. Meanwhile a steady rise experienced in the number...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her than that of men. Over five years, a drop by about one thousand males who w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, second, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75109170306 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43847267886 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497816593886 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2271007353 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163569154343 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796365670933 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459066093566 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106801042079 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036708323565 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.