The maps below show changes in a local industrial village of England called Stamdorf between 1985 and 2015.
The maps illustrate the construction in the local industrial village of Stamdorf in England at two different times: 1985 and 2015.
Overall, there has been a massive transformation in this village over the last 30 years, with more contemporary buildings being built. However, its layout in 2015 was still the same as in 1985, which had a bridge built across the Thames river connecting both sides of Arlington Avenue.
In 1985, the only notable establishment in the village was the factory on the banks of the Thames river, on the northeast side of the Arlington Road. Furthermore, a wooden bridge, which was located in the middle of the Thames, was across the river. Moving towards the northwest, crossing the bridge, on the right side of Arlington Road, an area that has small roadside inns was situated, and opposite this place, on the other side of the road, there existed a hexagon field.
In 2015, there were a plethora of modern buildings being built and divided into three territories, with housing estate 1 on the north side of the Thames river, while housing estate 2 was placed on the south side of this river. The old factories were demolished, relocated, and renovated into an industrial zone that appeared exactly to the north of Stamdorf, with a staff quarter located to the southwest of the industrial area. Additionally, a wooden bridge was replaced by a steel bridge, and there was a new crossroads that led straight ahead to an industrial zone. Finally, the field was transferred to the southwest corner of Arlington Road, while the roadside inns were shifted to the eastern side of the river, in the southeast corner.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92446043165 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67218737618 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507194244604 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.5592159688 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.9 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144190374638 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764286290606 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120586311148 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14908798178 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159835206035 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.