The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15-24 in Canada in 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar graph depicts, the two categories were internet users under 24 years and over 15 years in Canada in 2000.
According to the graph , lots of females were used in internet and secondly most internet users were in male. Five differet useful networks obtain in this graph. Namely, email, social networks, online shopping and other activities. Most of female were sent emails. females were jigher than malesin mail category. On the other hand male high proportion was used in soacial network. Social network users were female and male was shown approximately same percentage. Online shopping was used lots of females. Other activities were used on male . It is 18%. Female users were percentage devided in two males. Overall, emails and online shopping users female were increased. These types of network use male was shown roughly low percentage. Social and other activities were used shown rised males.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-21 | dhruv j patel | 88 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes( in billions) of telephone calls in the uk divided in to three categories from 1995- 2002. 56
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 67
- The line graph below show the population size birth and death rate of ENgland and Whales from 1700 to 2000 70
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree? 73
- The graph below gives information about the main purposes of overseas residents visit in the uk between 200 2016 36
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nada in 2000. According to the graph , lots of females were used in internet a...
^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Females
...ities. Most of female were sent emails. females were jigher than malesin mail category....
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ales. Other activities were used on male . It is 18%. Female users were percentage...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18243243243 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37749634887 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 9.0 22.4926829268 40% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2320073117 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 51.1333333333 112.824112599 45% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 9.86666666667 22.9334400587 43% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.86666666667 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143822123321 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552117916224 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546342053524 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14092593921 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329096617833 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.88 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.28 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 5.6 10.9970731707 51% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.