Given the bar chart illustrating the rate of milk sale to foreign countries in millions of tons from Italy, Russia, and Poland from 2008 to 2012. In general, it is clearly apparent that Russia had the highest export figures among the other countries in the given period.
At the beginning of the period, Russia supplied 24 millions of tons abroad while Italy only sold around 17 millions and Poland was a half at 12 millions. In the next two years, the Russian milk sale increased significantly to 40 millions which was the climax point. On the other hand, the supply from Poland declined into the lowest point at approximately 5 millions while Italy only rose slightly to 20 millions. The sale from Italy remained unchanged until the end of the period.
In 2011 and 2012, the Russian level began to fall down to 33 million and 28 millions but the Poland rate started to increase gradually to 15 million. However, the milk export figures of Russian still dominated the other two countries.
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 78
- Many people aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of this How to overcome this problem 61
- percentage of school children attendance among Specialist schools Grammar schools Voluntary controlled Schools Community Schools between the years 2000 and 2009
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo Japan listened to music over the previous month The pie chart shows a record company s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music Summarize the information by selecting and 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '24 million'.
Suggestion: 24 million
...eginning of the period, Russia supplied 24 millions of tons abroad while Italy only sold aroun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79069767442 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44086358389 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4877024389 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154120508826 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801427441694 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774583993283 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129496739201 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931613716664 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.