The Pie Chart illustrates about different trips went by both men and women in numbers in a certain European country in the year 2007.
Looking from Overall Perspective, it clearly states that, there are Five different categories of trips. Men are more interested in doing Travelling to work Trip. In Contrast, Women Prefer Shopping. However, Day trip is considered as least among all trips in both categories in 2007 year.
325 Travelling to work trips were made by Men was at approximately whereas only around 220 trips travelled by women followed by this, Men travelled around 190 Vising Friends trips. Sports/Entertainment and Shopping trips are at numbers around 130 and 180 respectively. In Comparison , Daily trips are lower, around only 25 which is almost one-thirteenth in Work Travel trips.
On the Contrary, Women travelled around 275 shopping trips, however, only 180 trips are done by men. Day and Sports/Entertainment Trips travelled are at about 25 and 210 respectively. When it comes to Visiting Friends and Business categories, Almost equal number of trips are made were around 200 in number by women.
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 72
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below shows the number and the purpose of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 78
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 30
- Some people believe that it is good to do multiple jobs While other believe that it is better to focus on one job disscuss both side and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 130 and 180 respectively. In Comparison , Daily trips are lower, around only 25 w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, whereas, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2320441989 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11861955812 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2272449772 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0909090909 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318733255657 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132395955739 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116625338418 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243923152024 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126124257638 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.