The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual
income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The chart below illustrates the changes in the number of U.S. households categorized by their annual income levels in 2007, 2011, and 2015.
Specifically, for households with incomes under $50,000, there were initially around 25 million households with annual incomes under $25,000. This number increased to nearly 30 million in 2011 and then decreased slightly to about 27 million in the final year. Similarly, households earning between $25,000 and $49,999 annually followed a similar trend, starting at around 26 million, reaching a peak of 30 million, and ending at about 29 million.
It is important to note that households in the $50,000 to $74,999 income range showed no change in numbers, remaining at just over 20 million throughout the entire period.
In terms of households with annual incomes above $75,000, there were nearly 15 million households earning $75,000-$99,999 in 2007. This number then increased to exactly 15 million by the end of the time frame, with a negligible decline in 2011. The figures for households with the highest income range ($100,000 and above) exhibited a more significant increase, rising from less than 30 million to about 33 million in 2011, dominating the rankings in 2015.
Overall, over the eight years, households with incomes under $50,000 initially increased and then slightly decreased. In contrast, households with incomes above $75,000 experienced minimal declines before rebounding, with households earning $75,000-$99,999 consistently having the lowest numbers. Middle-income households, on the other hand, remained stable throughout the period.
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spend their weekly income in 1968 and 2018
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...arning 5,000-9,999 in 2007. This number then increased to exactly 15 million by the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49794238683 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76076791658 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543209876543 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8773529968 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.454545455 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19307856242 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104484130222 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100037809245 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162566763166 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124138026217 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.