The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the annual income of the number of house owners who live in five different groups of income’s rate the United States in three 2007, 2011, and 2015 years.
It is obvious that in 2007 and 2015 there was an upward trend totally by the income of people who have a home and there was a decline in 2011 that had a downward trend rather than others. The highest number was related to 2015 and the lowest number was in 2007.
As can be seen, the two less than 25000$ and 25000-49999$ have increased to 30 million and then recovered to their first location in 2015. In contrast, the households who have 100000 or more income annually decreased first in 2011 and raised more than 34 million which was the heights point among all others. The incomes related to 75000-99999$ declined in 2007 and 2011 by about 1 million and reached 15 million in 2015. Although there were lots of changes in the owner’s income in the United States the people included 50000-74999$ did not change in these years.
In conclusion, the point is that the number of households income who gain less than 49999$ decreased.
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$25000'.
Suggestion: $25000
...07. As can be seen, the two less than 25000$ and 25000-49999$ have increased to 30 m...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-74999$ did not change in these years. In conclusion, the point is that the num...
^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$49999'.
Suggestion: $49999
...of households income who gain less than 49999$ decreased.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63316582915 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36178766162 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9421846366 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222314940415 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106582205455 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541968615965 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148757441453 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400467177138 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.