The given bar chart compares 3 travel-involved economic sectors in terms of their number of jobs in a certain British urban area from 1989 to 2009.
Overall, restaurant was the industry which created the most jobs among 3 surveyed categories during the period. In addition, it was a sector displaying an upward trend, while the two remaining counterparts expressed discernible declines throughout these two decades.
Turning into detail, in 1989, there were around 1100 employees working at the city’s restaurants. The figure increased remarkably, before reaching the peak of 1600 jobs in 2004. Despite a minor decrease throughout the remainders of the period, it still maintained its largest capacity of labors, compared to other items.
Regarding to the remaining sectors, sport and leisure as well as travel and tours shared the similar worker numbers of around 800 between 1989 and 1994. In the next 10 years, whereas jobs created by sport and leisure was kept stable at approximately 800, that of travel and tours fell dramatically to exactly 600. At the end of the stage, the former’s figure was almost twice as many as the latter’s, with nearly 700 and precisely 400 employees, respectively.
- This is an IELTS writing task 1 sample answer essay on the topic of dairy production by the world s top 3 producers from the real IELTS exam Summarise information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (e.g: environment, cost). Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- The line graph below provides the number of international conferences in three cities from 1965 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- Organized tours to remote places and communities is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 10
- The bar chart below The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000.Summarise the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... precisely 400 employees, respectively.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, still, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31443298969 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93012561046 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680412371134 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1829648907 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111308275398 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440715841746 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04265822528 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689049192612 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382792938969 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.