The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele
The given bar chart compares the number of people(in thousands) from both the sexes who pursued a higher level of education, which was further classified as full-time and part-time studies, in Britain over a period of three years from 1970/71 to 1990/91.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that although the initial figure for females was significantly low as compared to males, the former exceeded the latter in part-time studies and followed a similar number as men in full-time education. However, among both genders, part-time education was more popular.
According to the given illustration, about 1 million males enrolled for further part-time studies at the start of the period, a figure up by nearly one-fourth in comparison to the opposite sex. However, over time, a reverse trend dramatically pushed the female number to a peak value of over 1 million. On the contrary, a few fluctuations plummeted the number of men below 850 thousand.
Turning to the full-time educational courses, both the genders witnessed an increasing trend. Whilst males doubled in number to 200k by 1990/91, females observed a sharp upward trend in 1980/81. After that, the figure leveled off to value the same as men by the end of the period.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Essay showing the process by which carbonated drinks are made also called a diagram essay 84
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 78
- The given figure explains the design of modern landfills for household waste 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18048780488 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79271594399 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60487804878 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.0986977845 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297473789976 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117642637784 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552464705371 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182565039559 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379898895975 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.