The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from three age groups worked.
The given table compares the number of people who were employed in 10 different working sectors surveyed in the context of three different age-groups from 18 to 65.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that all three age-groups distribute randomly, to sum up, the highest people in the manufacturing sector, followed next by other areas including the health sector. In addition, the majority of youngsters are engaged in retail jobs, while most of the aged people are employed as manufacturers.
According to the given illustration, the maximum number of young people were posted in the retail sector and other jobs 23 and 21 respectively. However, with 12 each, health and manufacturing sector showed a similar trend. On the contrary, other sectors namely law, local government, accountancy, and education witnessed below 10 people between ages 18 and 25.
On the other hand, age-group 25-40 observed a significant demand in almost all the sectors as manufacturing and health 15 each, education and local government 12 each. Although the middle group earned a good share in many jobs, employment in other areas employed the highest number(18) of workers. With regard to 40 to 65 age-group, the manufacturing sector relied mainly upon experienced folks(23). Local government, health, and education sectors employed 18,12,12 people respectively. The remaining sectors as catering, accountancy, law and agriculture recorded a less number of 4,3,4, and 9 respectively.
- 49
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer descr 47
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 The bar chart shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, while, in addition, on the contrary, to sum up, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50216450216 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04967831844 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562770562771 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4564306211 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.545454545 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339150391868 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133405313628 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819883138675 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237920274567 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721719102417 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, while, in addition, on the contrary, to sum up, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50216450216 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04967831844 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562770562771 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4564306211 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.545454545 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339150391868 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133405313628 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819883138675 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237920274567 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721719102417 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.