The line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
The given line graph compares the consumable rate( in grams) measured per person per week of four different types of meat: Fish, Lamb, Chicken, and Beef in a European country over a period of 25 years from 1979 to 2004.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Beef, which was leading the trend in the early years, witnessed a dramatic fall. Although Chicken and lamb initiated with nearly similar value, reversed the behavior over time. In contrast, Fish remained the least and maintained a stable liking among all the meats.
According to the given illustration, more than 200grams of beef were consumed by a person over a week in 1979. After a decade, facing fluctuations, the trend acquired a similar rate(200gram) as of chicken, before plummeting below chicken nearly by half by the end of the period. On the other hand, in 1979, more than 50 gram of fish was eaten by a single individual, which fell steadily to 50 in 1982 and thereafter leveled off at 50 until 2004.
In the context of chicken and lamb, both started at 148 grams and 150 grams respectively in 1979. However, with the passing time, followed by a contrasting trend, the consumption of the former skyrocketed to a peak value of 250 grams, while the latter observed a significant downward trend with some fluctuations and slip to just 52 grams in 2004.
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 84
- An essay featuring two graphs a pie chart and a bar chart related to students in Singapore from 2000 to 2010 74
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that is it important 89
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attractions in Britain in the year 1999 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...n the other hand, in 1979, more than 50 gram of fish was eaten by a single individua...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82832618026 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65671129473 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605150214592 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.78236895 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186703904479 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620013549605 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869488000023 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115964975408 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109219982718 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.