The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The bar graph elucidates how many travelers using three distinguish airports in New York City from 1995 to 2000. Overall, the number of travelers using LaGuardia and Newark rose substantially despite the fact that, LaGuardia had the highest number of travelers, whereas John F. Kennedy airport experienced a periodic fluctuation.
Firstly, LaGuardia had the highest number of travelers of about 35 million of passengers in 1995, whereas John F. Kennedy had the second highest travelers with just above 25 million of passengers and only 15 million travelers used Newark airports. By 1997, the number of passengers using John F Kennedy rose to close to 50 million travelers, whilst LaGuardia and Newark had risen stably.
Notably, La Guardia airport recorded the highest travelling usages where it reached a peak at nearly 70 million passengers by 2000 in contrast to the number of travelers using Newark was unchanged at around 41 million travelers. Conversely, the number of travelers using John F. Kennedy airport rose constantly to reach at approximately 45 million passengers by 2000, although there was a periodic drop in its passenger of just over 30 million passengers in 1999.
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010. 73
- Some people say that teaching local history to school children is more important than teaching world history to them. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- As a part of education, students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'first', 'firstly', 'second', 'whereas', 'in contrast', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.307317073171 0.268076937826 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.107317073171 0.116061578633 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0536585365854 0.0759168565197 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0536585365854 0.0366838410393 146% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00975609756098 0.0131127313244 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.146341463415 0.155750635184 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0341463414634 0.0379272487307 90% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83758739819 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243902439024 0.0210936926555 116% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0634146341463 0.0948980150116 67% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0146341463415 0.00967000014798 151% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1185.0 1161.00487805 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.9 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.26984126984 5.90752243213 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73763899035 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.428571428571 0.337110787985 127% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.349206349206 0.247514529752 141% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216931216931 0.171178102325 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.169312169312 0.112407865282 151% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83758739819 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.546246751206 96% => OK
Word variations: 45.061191673 49.3433353143 91% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 31.5 23.0094962315 137% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5256139108 42.9750493124 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 197.5 135.714022679 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 23.0094962315 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 0.689975730869 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 66.4206349206 47.7609492067 139% => OK
Elegance: 2.85714285714 2.94281807926 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332469690461 0.418131533498 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.282547419711 0.181151798455 156% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.12065457373 0.0850326197045 142% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.772871901217 0.706616315825 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.101919038769 0.157042692854 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22176377938 0.228904883108 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754773998573 0.108899403657 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.483789972659 0.367819155151 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00434761590923 0.0812612215331 5% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278862492929 0.316326947829 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967210913003 0.0921553760075 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.