The bar chart compares the quantity of accidents and injuried commuters per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) on five different types public transport in the year 2002.
Looking at the bar chart from an overall perpective, demand response recorded the highest numbers of incidents and injuries. A reverse pattern was seen toward commuter rail service.
Demand response gained 225 incidents and 173 injuries which was much ten times higher than those of the commuter rail. There were 20 incidents and 17 people were injured on commuter rail.
It is also evident from the provided information that bus and light rail had the same figure for accidents, both standing at 76 PMT unit. Meanwhile, in term of injuries, the former was almost twofold to latter, representing at 66 and 39 respectively. Heavy rail saw lower numbers of such events than the two above, standing at 51 PMT in accidents and 35 injuries.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 50
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ried commuters per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT on five different ty...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07236842105 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60186347827 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690789473684 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5211204778 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.375 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187751078073 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076554829798 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106284948247 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130546688098 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126352322744 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.