The given column chart delineates information about the proportion of adults by age groups using the Internet in the 4-years period starting with 2003 in the Great Britain.
Overall, It is clearly seen that people aging between 16 and 24 showed the greatest ratio of utilization the Internet. In addition to the that, the over 65 years old individuals made up the least percentage of The Internet users.
We can see from the chart that the main users were 16-24 age group with 80% in the years 2003 and 2004. And then this figure increased significantly to 100% and slipped back to approximately 90%, Moreover, as compared to last year, there was a gradual go up in 2004 for 25-44 age group, from almost 50% to 60%. Between 2005 and 2006, a moderate rise was observed in the same group. Similarly, Usage of Internet in the 45 to 54 age group rose from 60% in 2003 to 80% in 2006.
Looking at the bar chart in more detail, although the ratios had minor fluctuation, the overall trend was upward for the rest of the age groups. For example, the highest percentage of these age groups, namely 55-64, 65 and more years old, was nearly 50% in 2006.
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- IELTS Task 1 Tables give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 73
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 86
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits Write a report for a university lecturer the process below 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, similarly, then, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54106280193 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41544927534 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618357487923 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.527143354 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325443569636 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135779353207 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737630622175 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185814961873 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067475441338 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.