Area of profession is one of the most important thing in our life because almost whole people spend large portion of their life working in the same profession. For this reason some people believe that youngest can be freed to decide their occupation but other do not think so. I strongly support the first idea and my personal view will be explained in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, It is crystal-clear fact that our world and business opportunities have changed constantly. That is why it is getting harder to keep up these changes and youth have a command of current affairs about technological and carrier opportunities. On the one hand, even if they are sibling or father and son, everyone interest different kind of subjects. While somebody gives importance to technical or health sectors, other people take interest in music or arts. I think teen of a certain age can know their field of interest. They do not make bad decisions for their future.
On the other hand families do not want their children to take wrong decisions and they expect their children to do whatever parent choice. They commonly believe that arts and sports, which include music, theater, cinema and football, can not offer their children to accurate a business opportunity. Therefore, they do not allow their children to have artistic jobs. Actually they are right to fear because they have life experience and want the best for their kids.
To conclude, young people should decide on their own occupation. When they do this, they ask our family what is their view and advise. Thus, they can both make the right decision and work in the area they want and be happy with.
- The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000 and 2010. 84
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 73
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 86
- The diagram below explains the process of recycling plastic bottles for new uses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village park now 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86219081272 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5246799629 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579505300353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0196978786 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19538312717 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750764708928 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789119116556 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124718115688 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280029527584 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.