The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003-2006. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003-2006. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given column chart demonstrates the rate of people of various age sections with the internet used between 4 years from 2003 to 2006.

In overview, the group of the youngest one from the grath used the highest rate of net, while the oldest used least net than other groups.

To begin with, age group of 16-24 old needed similar percentage of internet in 2003 and 2004 around four fifth. With time use increased minimmaly and became 100% in 2005, While it slightly dropped next year around to 90%.

Moving towards 25-44 age group, in 2003 it was around a half(50%), which increased with small changes yearly and it was 80% in 2006. Further group of 45-54 age, has changed same as 25-44 group number 60-80%.

Finally, the group of 55-64 has numbers with a little flactuation of 30,35,33 and 50% respectively in 2003 to 2006 and the oldest group has least usege of net and it was increased with time just as previous group.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-23 Krushillathiya 73 view
2019-10-04 mifas meleraroth 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fifth' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'fifths'.
Suggestion: fifths
...f internet in 2003 and 2004 around four fifth. With time use increased minimmaly and ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
... changes yearly and it was 80% in 2006. Further group of 45-54 age, has changed same as...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63636363636 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19169481698 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5092342603 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203132306541 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105601642709 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504762171555 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122624665573 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408413389839 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.