The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.

The bar chart illustrate the changes in the share of international students who graduated from universities in different Canadian provinces over a five years of period percentage wise.

Overall, it can be seen that new Brunswick had highest figures between the years of 2001to 2006.as lowest figure had been seen in Ontario throughout the 5 years of period .

The graph depict that,All region Percentage of 2001 was lower than percentage of share in 2006. We can say that Ontario had lowest figure in 2001, accounting for about 3% where as 6% in 2006 . meantime .the percentage of share for Manitoba and newfound land and Labrador was exactly same around 4% and then increased by approximately 3% in 2006.In times of British Columbia, the figure had been more than doubled From 4% in 2001 to 11% in 2006.

For Quebec and Nova Scotia,the figure accounted for about nearly same at 6% in 2001. While it increased slightly to 8% for Quebec and 11% for Nava Scotia in 2006 The percentage of share changes in new Brunswick was 7% in 2001, which was highest over the period before experiencing an increase with 5% in period of 5 years that was largest proportion of the whole period from 2001 to 2006.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-01-25 Vuthungan 78 view
2021-12-01 dangchan21 78 view
2021-04-19 tranuyen 73 view
2019-09-10 Mohamad Alen Aliansyah 84 view
2019-08-24 fachryadul92 11 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...rall, it can be seen that new Brunswick had highest figures between the years of 2001to 200...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...Ontario throughout the 5 years of period . The graph depict that,All region Per...
^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'depicts'.
Suggestion: depicts
...ut the 5 years of period . The graph depict that,All region Percentage of 2001 was ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , All
...ars of period . The graph depict that,All region Percentage of 2001 was lower tha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
... share in 2006. We can say that Ontario had lowest figure in 2001, accounting for about 3%...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...figure in 2001, accounting for about 3% where as 6% in 2006 . meantime .the percentage o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ounting for about 3% where as 6% in 2006 . meantime .the percentage of share for M...
^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meantime
...ting for about 3% where as 6% in 2006 . meantime .the percentage of share for Manitoba a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... about 3% where as 6% in 2006 . meantime .the percentage of share for Manitoba and...
^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...n increased by approximately 3% in 2006.In times of British Columbia, the figure h...
^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...% in 2006. For Quebec and Nova Scotia,the figure accounted for about nearly same ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
... in new Brunswick was 7% in 2001, which was highest over the period before experiencing an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the largest'.
Suggestion: was the largest
...rease with 5% in period of 5 years that was largest proportion of the whole period from 200...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77884615385 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61313618582 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533653846154 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.3248077572 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283036766573 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146091724608 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126071737828 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193933632605 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143929552539 0.0819641961636 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.