THe chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008.
The line graph compares the income gap by gender in five major nations between 1978 and 2008.
Overall, it is evident from the given chart that income disparity in Japan was by far highest in comparison with the relatively smaller numbers of Australia and the UK. Besides, while four out of five countries witnessed a decrease in terms of salary gap, that of Australia increased in the last decade examined.
In 1978, income difference between men and women in Japan was around 48 per cent, which was much larger than the US, the UK by nearly 10 per cent and doubled that of the remaining nations. These thereafter followed by a steady fall over 2 decade period.
In 1998, the percentage of income gap in Japan continued to decline to just above 40 per cent after a decade. Likewise, a downward trend was also observed in the UK, the US, and France when they went down by about 2 percent. However, that of Australia suddenly increased in 1998 and overtook the proportion of salary disparity in France before reaching about 25 per cent in the last stage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | minhthanh211 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | Bùi Minh Châu | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-16 | Minh Pham | 56 | view |
| 2017-04-05 | kingnight153 | 78 | view |
| 2017-04-05 | kingnight153 | 78 | view |
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 72
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 77
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they gotmarried in oneparticularcountry in1996 and2008. 56
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 92
- the three maps shows changes in the village of Kelsbey from 1780 to 2000 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68449197861 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42098974407 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598930481283 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6135630182 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198272383541 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736614514556 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813779195975 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12212120576 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06466213118 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.