The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women form 1978 to 2008
The line graph illustrates the income gap between males and females in five nations from 1978 to 2008.
Overall, it is apparent that the proportion of difference in earnings between men and women in the countries witnessed a decreasing trend for most of the period. However, the gap in Australia improved substantially after 1998.
Commencing at 50 per cent in 1978 as the first place, the difference percentage in income between genders in Japan went down gradually by 10 per cent in 2018. Similarly, the period of 1978-2008 experienced a minimal reduction in the earning difference between males and females from 30 per cent to 28 per cent in the US.
In UK and France, the income gap also fell with the same pace over the 30 years. Between 1978 and 2008, there was a slight drop by 3 per cent from 29 per cent and 20 per cent in UK and France, respectively. Whereas, beginning at 19 per cent, the earnings inequality by genders in Australia remained steady until 1998 at approximately 18 per cent before rocketing to to its peak at 14 per cent in the next 10 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-04 | Tinylavender | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-04 | Tinylavender | 61 | view |
| 2017-03-17 | Jason Pappachan | 56 | view |
| 2017-03-10 | huonglo | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women form 1978 to 2008 78
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013. 78
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie chart below shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earnings'' or 'earning's'?
Suggestion: earnings'; earning's
... Whereas, beginning at 19 per cent, the earnings inequality by genders in Australia rema...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6312849162 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68662232459 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558659217877 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6294228362 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161266776943 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842797046453 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799525175507 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125322468874 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492767453832 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.