The chart below shows the percentage of fatal accidents by locations in a European country. The survey was conducted in 2000.
The provided bar graph gives information about the proportion of fatal crashes by rural and urban in a European country with speed limit in 2000
Overall, it is clear that maximum accidents noticed by the urban with low-speed limit, while, rural faced more crashes by the high-speed.
As can be seen from the graph that above 70% accidents observed by the urban at 30 mph or less speed limit, in contrast, rural accounted for 22% at the same speed limit. However, fatal crashes decreased with the increasing speed limit by the urban while, rural fatal accidents went up sharply with the high-speed limit.
At the speed limit 45-50 mph, a little difference noticed between rural and urban accidents, 51% and 49% respectively. Moreover, fatal crashes of rural reached at the top at above 80% at the 55 mph speed limit where, below 20% crashes had been noticed by the urban. Interestingly, at the 60 mph or higher speed limit, accidents of urban inclined while a drop was seen by rural.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Sandhu param | 86 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | parth patel officiall | 54 | view |
| 2018-06-30 | Kaurrippan0@gmail.com | 79 | view |
- Some people say taxes should be spent on health care. Other people say that there are more important priorities for tax payers money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and meat in European countries 11
- The diagram below show how an office building look at present and the plan for its future development 75
- The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990 2000 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 102, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'limit' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'limits'.
Suggestion: limits
...ed by the urban at 30 mph or less speed limit, in contrast, rural accounted for 22% a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89411764706 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49947399311 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6306707752 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0865145151492 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553344381347 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329120175447 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681644530138 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289971358409 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.