The chart below shows the percentage of fatal accidents by locations in a European country The survey was conducted in 2000

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of fatal accidents by locations in a European country. The survey was conducted in 2000.

The provided bar graph gives information about the proportion of fatal crashes by rural and urban in a European country with speed limit in 2000

Overall, it is clear that maximum accidents noticed by the urban with low-speed limit, while, rural faced more crashes by the high-speed.

As can be seen from the graph that above 70% accidents observed by the urban at 30 mph or less speed limit, in contrast, rural accounted for 22% at the same speed limit. However, fatal crashes decreased with the increasing speed limit by the urban while, rural fatal accidents went up sharply with the high-speed limit.

At the speed limit 45-50 mph, a little difference noticed between rural and urban accidents, 51% and 49% respectively. Moreover, fatal crashes of rural reached at the top at above 80% at the 55 mph speed limit where, below 20% crashes had been noticed by the urban. Interestingly, at the 60 mph or higher speed limit, accidents of urban inclined while a drop was seen by rural.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (21 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-06 Sandhu param 86 view
2019-07-30 parth patel officiall 54 view
2018-06-30 Kaurrippan0@gmail.com 79 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 102, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'limit' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'limits'.
Suggestion: limits
...ed by the urban at 30 mph or less speed limit, in contrast, rural accounted for 22% a...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89411764706 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49947399311 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6306707752 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0865145151492 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553344381347 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329120175447 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681644530138 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289971358409 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.