The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012

The pie chart describe about woman members of parliament in five Union European since in 2000 to 2012. Overall it can be seen that, over the period as whole the level of female members of parliament rose in all countries. In spite of, in Belgium country has fluctuation.
First of all, Germany and France which have similar pattern data of feminine members parliament.There was a gradual rise in the number of the parliament-working girls around 3 in Germany, and Increased half in France amount of 6. Subsequently.In Belgium had fluctuated of data. 2004 saw a sharp grown in the women part of parliament rate to 24. but over following four years total of female ranker nearly remained constant. Then, the figure of UK had significant increased of 20 from 2000 and 2012. Both Belgium and UK State which have some total of womankind limb of parliament in 2012 around 23 until 24. Afterwards, the highest grade of fellow parliament in all nation in Italy.there was a significant peak from 32 to 39 between 2008 to 2012.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-11 kashyap sahil view
2023-04-11 kashyap sahil view
2020-06-13 CiaraNguyen view
2020-05-15 Munn Nguyen 90 view
2020-05-15 Hường Nguyễn8 78 view
Essays by user Vivi Fitriani :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he level of female members of parliament rose in all countries. In spite of, in B...
^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...h have similar pattern data of feminine members parliament.There was a gradual rise in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...ern data of feminine members parliament.There was a gradual rise in the number of the...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...d Increased half in France amount of 6. Subsequently.In Belgium had fluctuated of data. 200...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...alf in France amount of 6. Subsequently.In Belgium had fluctuated of data. 2004 s...
^^
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amount of 6. Subsequently.In Belgium had fluctuated of data. 2004 saw a sharp gro...
^^
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...he women part of parliament rate to 24. but over following four years total of fema...
^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lowing four years total of female ranker nearly remained constant. Then, the figu...
^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emained constant. Then, the figure of UK had significant increased of 20 from 20...
^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... figure of UK had significant increased of 20 from 2000 and 2012. Both Belgium a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, first of all, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80113636364 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9255515744 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0544807044 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307252648376 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105777776062 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829255409657 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2576448609 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067645191175 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.