The chart gives information about the percentage in terms of households owning and renting accommodation in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011.
Overall, the percentage of households owning accommodation demonstrated an upward trend while the figure for households renting accommodation declined over the 93 years.
Look into more detail, households in owned accommodation occupied just over 20% while the percentage of households in rented accommodation occupied almost 80% in 1918. By 1939, the percentage of households owning accommodation increased to more than 30%, at the same time, the percentage of households renting accommodation decreased to less than 70%. In the following 14 years, the figures remained at the same level. From 1953 to 2001, the number of households owning accommodation showed a stable upward trend. By contrast, households renting accommodation experienced a lasting decline.
However, after presenting dramatic growth, households owning accommodation demonstrated a small decrease to approximately 65%. Meanwhile, the figure for households renting accommodation up to around 35%.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 61
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 78
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94409937888 4.92477711251 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38539516574 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9547565598 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340674020699 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168320347812 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109315318409 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254631359381 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108838168931 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.4140731707 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.