The chart gives information about the number of one country’s exports in five different items in 2015 and 2016, while the table compares the percentage change in each item of export between these two years.
According to the chart, it is clear that petroleum products earned the highest number of money, with more than $60 billion, orderly followed by engineered goods, gems and jewellery, and agricultural products. In contrast, textiles were the least popular products which earned only approximately $25 billion in 2015 and just over $30 billion in 2016.
According to the table, we can see although textiles earned the least amount of money, the percentage presented the largest rose with around 15%. Engineered goods, petroleum products, and agricultural products increased by 8.5%, 3%, and 0.81% respectively. In contrast, gems and jewellery was the only one which showed a downward trend with 5.18%.
Overall, petroleum products earned the largest number of money, whereas textiles demonstrated the fastest growth.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- Some people believe that the women should play an equal role as men in country’s police and military fierce, such as army, while others, think women are not suitable for these king of work. Discuss and give your opinion. 56
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45283018868 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80637077764 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610062893082 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8010343741 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.857142857 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221978656032 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913229976185 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120292499697 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133791270724 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141567766752 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.