The line graph compares the average carbon dioxide emissions by residents in four different European countries from 1967 to 2007.
It is clear that people in the UK emitted the most amount of carbon dioxide throughout the period shown. Also, while the emissions in the UK and Sweden showed a downward trend, the emissions in Italy and Portugal experienced a gradual rise. Overall, the gaps among these countries narrowed.
On the one hand, the emission in the UK fell steadily from almost 11 tons in 1967 to approximately 9 tons in 2007, although it remained the largest figure. As for Sweden, after a dramatic rise, from about 9 tons to over 10 tons by 1977, there was a sharper decline to less than 6 tons over the following thirty years.
By contrast, with regards to the volume of carbon dioxide emission per person in Italy, it was doubled from around 4 tons in 1967 to almost 8 tons in 2007. Similarly, there was a dramatic increase in Portugal, in 1967 people used to emit only 1 ton individually but in 2007 they emitted almost 6 tons per head. Interestingly, the emissions in Italy and Portugal overtook that of Sweden in 1987 and 2007 respectively.
- Some people believe that the women should play an equal role as men in country’s police and military fierce, such as army, while others, think women are not suitable for these king of work. Discuss and give your opinion. 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 61
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72549019608 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63771043518 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3450177888 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.111111111 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22231809027 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106882650956 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759603308637 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15204936829 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630240732129 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.