The displayed chart illustrates the share of households in owned and rented accommodation in two countries (England and Wales) from 1981 to 2011.
As an overall trend, the proportion of households in rented accommodation was greater than the percentage of households in owned accommodation during that time whereas the maximum percentage of households in owned accommodation was in 2001 and the percentage of households in rented accommodation remained the lowest. However, the largest percentage of households for rented
accommodation was in 1918 while the percentage of households for owned accommodation was the minimum. Additionally, households in owned and rented accommodation owned the same proportion in 1971.
In 1981, households in owned accommodation was approximately 23%. It developed to almost 32% in 1939 and in 1953 it was constant. Then, it improved significantly from about 32% to 69% between 1939 and 2001. However, it slightly dropped to about 64% in 2011.
As far as households in rented accommodation are concerned, 1918 was the boom year with nearly 78% which started to drop afterwards. Though it remained constant at around 68% between 1939 and 1953, it continued to go down and reached only 30% in 2001. In the year 2011, it slightly increased to around 36%.
- Countries are become more and more similar because people are able to buy the same prodcuts anywhere in the world Do you think this is positive or negative development 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons fo 78
- The tables give information on the temperatures and hours of Daylight during the same week in December 2018 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3431372549 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25744054088 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455882352941 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 73.2211639007 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0909090909 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314378898569 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125383281538 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976252878511 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201467606431 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823730813925 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.