the chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in UK in 2010.
The line graph describes between men and women teachers about educational setting of different types in 2010 in UK. On the whole, the percentage of preceptorial control there was diversification for every category.
In 2010, nursery or pre school of female stood at 88% compared to male which was 2% and had the big discrimination. The next regulation is primary school where ladies got 87% and be discovered off, gentlemen finish at 3%. For secondary school, among preceptor of feminine and mannish, posses the low aberration that are 48% and 44%. Distinct with this circumstances which obtained twin denomination specifically of 46%. Advance to one level than other faction before, men which got value of 47% and women received for 44% only. Last genus, there was zoom of manlike achieved for 65% than womenkind was got at only 45%.
Finally, the average of adjustment of scholastic dominated by female instructor and forward occupation by male. The graphical shows there dissimilarity and identical strength.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-26 | Jannatul firdausi rahma | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | fadhiahelbas | 78 | view |
- the chart below shows the GDP growt per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show UK and USA energy comsumption in 2000 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in japan and malaysia in this year. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ion that are 48% and 44%. Distinct with this circumstances which obtained twin denom...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25766871166 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.955412827 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.723926380368 0.547539520022 132% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.5370524875 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.7 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184014099996 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658457005117 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992050925366 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149460288993 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106148817436 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.