The chart below show the percentage of female and male teachers in six different types of educational setting in UK in 2010.
The line graph below illustrates the comparison the percentage of men and women teacher in six different varieties of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
Overall, it is able to the most obvious information that girls absolutely prefer to select nursery or pre school whilst the boys tend to choose university.
Regarding to the data, the most popular demand component by ladies was the nursery or pre-school which stood at almost 100%, the same with primary school close to 90%. Furthermore, in university became the most decreased part on the period. Only went down about 75% lower. While on secondary school, college and private training institute also falling significantly to between 60% and 40% approximately.
Unlike with the case above, the guy happened to most sharply increased progress that started from nursery get 0,1%, it reached a peak to 0,5% in university dramatically. Then, the second biggest proportion in private training institute counted at 45%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-26 | Jannatul firdausi rahma | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | fadhiahelbas | 78 | view |
- The line graph compares the production of energy from coal in Sweden France Denmark and Germany between 1995 and 2010 32
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this 61
- The pie chart compares the proportion of enrolments on six different courses at a UK collegeof education in 2010 and 2012 78
- The line chart below show The percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 61
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illustrates the comparison the pe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... institute also falling significantly to between 60% and 40% approximately. Unli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26282051282 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82391257806 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.711538461538 0.547539520022 130% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7307654362 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120519591184 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541953996287 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143387549621 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108390799257 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187738371387 0.0819641961636 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.