The chart illutrates the proportion of both male and female students studying six art-based subjects at a Uk educational institution in 2011.
Overall, almost students tended to follow English language and literature subjects. Besides, there was a much larger percentage of female partook at the same subjects, exceptionally in art and design, the amount of male was more than female over the period shown.
Firstly, for male, the ratio of male who took part in philosophy was the smallest percentage, at about 50. Next, the figure for history and archeology was more than philosogy nearly 50. Besides, the distance of linguistics, art and design, communication and media stud was not a huge alternative, the rate was around 200. In this period, the ratio of some male students peak nearly 230.
On the other hand, for female, the rate of history and archeology was under 100 as a smallest amount in comparison with other subjects. The figure for philosogy and art and design were approximately 150 but art and design was a little higher. The three other subjects including linguistics, English language and literature, communication was attractive plenty of female students, the rate was more than 200 even peaked 250 for English subjects
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ents studying six art-based subjects at a Uk educational institution in 2011. Ov...
^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...history and archeology was under 100 as a smallest amount in comparison with othe...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15346534653 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83184327596 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534653465347 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6654533157 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1802325683 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858938155972 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111254836556 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164590909344 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141065823138 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.