The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

The given bar chart illustrate the research about the consumption of coffee and tea and also drinking habits of citizens in five cities of Australia.

At the first glance of the chart, it is noticeable that from all the five categories, fresh coffee was bought at least.On the contrary, there was a largest number of people visited to coffee shop for coffee and tea with exception in Adelaide.

Looking at the chart in more detail, it can be clearly observed that the proportion of residents in Melbourne and Hobart who chose coffee shop to drink were the most characteristic, at around 64%, and 63%, correspondingly. Then,Sydney made up just over 60%, followed by Brisbane about 55%, and finally Adelaide at a little less than 50%. In addition, Adelaide was the only city where people tended to bought instant coffee more than going to coffee shops, accounting for 50% of overall Adelaide's residents. In term of instant coffee, in Hobart, instant coffee purchased stood at just under 55%, and 53% in Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney occupied by 48% and 46%, respectively.

Turning to fresh coffee, people paid money for it in Brisbane at least, almost identical to Adelaide, with nearly 35%. It is quite the opposite in Sydney held approximately 44%, then in Melbourne at 43%,and finally in Hobart took up 38%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eable that from all the five categories, fresh coffee was bought at least.On the ...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...ries, fresh coffee was bought at least.On the contrary, there was a largest numbe...
^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ght at least.On the contrary, there was a largest number of people visited to cof...
^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Sydney
...ound 64%, and 63%, correspondingly. Then,Sydney made up just over 60%, followed by Bris...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, look, so, then, at least, in addition, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96832579186 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71860234573 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58371040724 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.519226707 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.25 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164106635472 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078437291583 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789317656895 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124379701841 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852187950935 0.0819641961636 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.