The chart below shows the sale of cars and trucks in Italy from 2001 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates how many cars and trucks were sold in Italy over a period of 7 years starting from 2001.

The sale of car in 2001 and 2002 was constant and it was 25 thousand. After that it was increased steadily from 2003 to 2004 and reached at 40 thousand, it remained stable until 2005. After that a decline was seen in 2006, while at the end of the period of time ,the sale of cars was reached at the peak point in 2008 and it was reached approximately 48 thousand.

The number of trucks sold in Italy in 2001 and 2002 were 20 thousand and 15 thousand respectively. The sale remained unchanged during 2002 to 2004, and then the sale of trucks was increased rapidly until 2005, while a dramatically decrease was seen in 2006. In 2007 and 2008 it remained stable and it was at the very low point (5 thousand).

Overall, the sale of cars showed upward trend while the sale of trucks showed downward trend over the given period

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s seen in 2006, while at the end of the period of time ,the sale of cars was reached at the pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., while at the end of the period of time ,the sale of cars was reached at the peak...
^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...was increased rapidly until 2005, while a dramatically decrease was seen in 2006. In 2007 and 2008 it r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40571428571 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32392349447 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468571428571 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5967845327 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.375 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178539726713 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951519200108 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515161565879 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135377878065 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037574859728 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.57 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.